small overlap IIHS crash test of the 2017 cabin crew Nissan Titan
2017 Nissan Titan short on small IIHS Crash Test Overlap Falls.
The new Nissan half-ton Titan did not fair well in Insurance Institute crash tests before small overlap of road safety The pickup scored only marginal, a lower level of classification bad tests revealed the Titan pilot area has not been maintained, with 11 inches of intrusion into the footwell below These results would probably have resulted in injuries to the left foot and right leg, said IIHS.
In the above video, it is clear to see the barrier push the front left tire to the bottom of the column A, deforming it rearwardly into the foot well of the driver intrusion zone in the upper portion the cabin through the instrument panel, measured 7 4 inches and the steering column has been pushed towards the rear 3 to 5 inches to the crash test dummy again, IIHS have noted possible injury to His legs.
The IIHS decomposes its scores, selecting damage to each area of the body, as well as scoring the structure and the vehicle safety cage Marginal classified structure, while the neck of the head, chest, thigh, hip, and represses its got a note from good leg and foot area scored the lowest rating of poor, which combined with the marginal notation of the structure and safety cage, led to an overall score of marginal.
2017 Nissan Titan did well in all other test crash He scored well in the moderate overlap, side impact, roof strength test, and the head restraints and seats the system back seat LATCH has been classified an acceptable level terms of ease of use of Titan's flagship didn t price so well, however, scoring a marginal It is easier to give the Titan a pass on this note, however, that the headlights assessments are new to the IIHS testing regime 2017 crash test small overlap as has been around since 2012.
So this raises the question of this result discourage you from buying a Titan pickup crash test Let us know in the comments below.
Adjusting my reserved nature, apart from objective, it is extremely difficult for me to understand why the 2017 Titan hurt in this crash test The crash test small overlap has been around for nearly five years, giving automakers more than enough time to adjust engineering and design standards to meet automakers criteria use CAD software and other tools to digitally simulate a crash test, allowing adjustments even before the first prototype is handmade this is not as IIHS testing headlights where automakers haven t had the test design time equipment -passing giving Nissan Why wasn t that taken internally, long before the IIHS got hold of the truck.
Of course, Nissan is not the only automaker in fault The instance of the new-for-2015 F-150 comes to mind extended cab trucks lacked a brace on frame that kept the front tires to deform the interior, much like what happened with the Titan extended cab F-150 scored a marginal, while the crew of the F-150 cab scored a good all thanks to the Ford steel bar tackled the issue with installing bars on all F-150 models for the 2016 model year.
Nissan could borrow a set of Ford, install a kind of protection bar designed to deflect the wheel and tire of the passenger If nothing is done, the Titan is still the worst performer pickup in the crash test small overlap Nissan surely wouldn t want that many customers rely heavily on the results of crash tests as determining metrics for purchase.
Of course, Nissan will solve the problem, but to do so will cost time and resources that could be used on other vehicles as border projects coming mid-size It also probably sends a shock wave in the Titan manufacturing process, adjustments must be made by receiving structural changes This error will probably cost money Nissan, both in lost sales and address the problem.
If and when Nissan announced its solution, we will bring you new here TOPSPEED Trucks.
The redesigned Nissan Titan failed to hold in the Insurance Institute for small crash test before overlap of road safety, winning only a marginal rating.
The performance of the cabin crew Titan contrast with another great pickup that was redesigned for 2017, the Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline, which was included in the initial list of Top Safety Pick winners will be announced in December, is the only pickup so far to win 2017 award from IIHS and the third, after the cabin crew Ford F-150 extended cab, to get good notes on five impact resistance testing of 'Institute.
The small overlap test is the most difficult of the IIHS tests of impact resistance, but manufacturers have adapted their models to meet the challenge since the test was introduced in 2012 as the most popular vehicle classes, most vehicles earn now a high.
The test is designed to replicate what happens when the front corner of the driver's side of a vehicle strikes another vehicle or an object such as a tree or utility pole.
In the small overlap test the Titan, the pilot area was not been well maintained, with intrusion to 11 inches pillar of the lower door hinge taken measures of the driver dummy indicated that injuries to his left leg would probably be in a world actual accident as serious left foot injury in his right leg would also be possible.
Titan gaining good grades in the other stress tests to bumper moderate overlap, side, roof strength and head restraints He didnt system to prevent accidents before available, and the two leading systems available are classified marginal .
To qualify for 2017 Top Safety Pick, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the five resistance tests IIHS small overlap front bumper before moderate overlap, side and roof strength and head restraints a note advanced or greater for the prevention of accidents before and an acceptable level or note of headlights.
The Ridgeline has a front upper accident prevention system rated optional It has rated lights on its two most expensive trim levels base Headlights are classified poor.
2017 Nissan Titan on short SmallOverlap IIHS crash test truck Falls News @ Top Speed, 2017 nissan titan.