Subaru & Results SPC crash tests Revealed
P ets took a role more and more important in our lives and exploits their photos and dominate the social media sites Facebook and Instagram However, it is difficult to imagine an industry of $ 60 billion as lightly regulated than the industry pet products.
Leashes food to toys, little testing is done, much less made public provision Treats made from dried meat animals and even sweet potatoes have caused kidney failure and death in many dogs and Snaps locks fail on the slopes and necklaces at the worst possible time exposed cute toys to the store for pets become later risk of suffocation or digestive While there are loose standards on the food side, producers often keep content and nutritional profiles tighter need to know that the intelligence of the CIA code word.
Pet owners parents, if you are old to the intelligence of any nature that can help them make good decisions about the products they bring home for their four-legged friends that gave birth to a explosion of pet advice sites, most written by lay people with a minority presence of actual veterinary While all are well-intentioned, some sites will recite hearsay as fact and authors often lack the time or training to apply critical thinking to really publicly available information.
Enter the Pet Safety Center, a nonprofit organization whose goal is to develop standards for safe animal products and determination that make the grade after CPS performance tests at their initial goal of animals and Travel recently published a study on the SPC travel funds has also received funding from Subaru automobile manufacturer as part of their Subaru Loves initiative Pets combining video flying crash test dogs around, a great sponsor and a commendable job has printed and considerable attention to TV and SPC tests.
U nfortunately SPC testing methodology is a failure perhaps more shocking is that Subaru would participate in and promote the media's attention to a study, they certainly knew, or should have known was wrong from the start.
CPS considerable emphasis on two points in their tests that the dog is limited by the fund and the fund remains anchored to the test trolley Their rationale for this criterion is to minimize the risk of a file is damaged or broken during an accident.
The CPS test trolley and the record is longer than the cargo area with the seats down all but the largest SUV Escalade think or suburban their first try, SPC sets a box in the center of the sled, leaving 20 or more simulation seatback This is not a real world scenario and is also contrary to the requirements of European standard they claim to follow ECE R-17, used for crash tests seatbacks with a cargo the second test positions the cash directly behind the backrest.
In both races, the body is attached to d-rings mounted on the test trolley with straps provided by the PSC body manufacturer clearly states in its report that it is essential, in their opinion, the straps will not come off during the crash test so that the body remains in place.
It's when a Subaru engineer should have politely pointed out that the d-rings used by CPS does not reflect those available in a vehicle for consumption Photo below shows enough clearly.
Specifically, the SPC of rings used are very well anchored.
Why is this a critical issue as the SPC test Let's take a recent Subaru Outback as an example in the owner's manual, Subaru says the cargo lashing points are rated at 110 lb and should be used to secure light cargo.
Even taking into account the typical safety margins, the moorings are grossly overmatched by the collision forces to a final result in dog crate a crate on the lose, but in the SPC test, anchor and ring are so sure that a production has to pass the test is to use a nominal strap for large loads high forces There is no need to be concerned that the ring-d and the anchor break.
In fact, the CPS was well aware of this, up to place a warning on car lashings elsewhere on their website SPC chose to completely ignore this risk in the design of their crash test In their latest analysis, SPC granted better performance to a fund whose sole remained anchored on the test trolley by using straps extra force of 2500 lbs If the straps are attached to car lashings, the body would not have remained attached.
In the same breath, CPS did not give a bonus to a single fund designed to crumple in a crash Why Because the body is detached from sled All other criteria were met the test dog was contained and all doors remained functional the body, although partially collapsed as its design has retained its structural integrity and do not place the occupant at risk of bent or broken parts.
So in effect, SPC gave a recommendation to the parent animals safe thing to do is buy a case which was not really tested while directing the same time far from a crate that has survived the rigors of CPS of the simulated crash succeeds in committing not only a type I error, but also a type II error in the same test.
It should also be emphasized that the SCP never whether these cases that have an impact on a case caused any significant damage is there already a risk for a human occupant Does CPS monitor even that given their extreme concentration on preventing such an impact in the first place, it seems reasonable that the silence on this point an indication that no boxes has caused significant damage If so, what does this say about their recommendation on where to place the travel crate in the cargo area.
A web search will turn countless links to TV reports, blog posts, magazine copy and Subaru press release touting the objectives and results of the PSC fund Test In each case, the test method and the results are not never questioned and simply considered prima facie evidence of safety.
A feel good story with what looks like a scientific backing a dangerous combination is easily accepted by ordinary people, they are obviously not able to spend the time and may lack the knowledge to challenge cases of collision tests for pets or any other consumer which is the work of someone else, right.
Formerly, journalists could make an effort to challenge and vet these tests before trumpeting study results Unfortunately, the decline of readers, the benefits and attention span ravaged investigative journalism.
The sad reality of our present time is the only party able to challenge this research are the sponsors themselves and that is disturbing effect when sponsorship is simply a marketing tool to get more sales and profits higher.
A more detailed examination of the problems with CPS crash tests and in general travel fund is in search of a crate Travel Safe, a report in the White Paper.
SubaruCPS Pet crash study fails the test - ismypetsafe - Medium, accident, study, test, embedded test trolley.