Access Panels: Drainspotting Adventure & Factory Tour ★ only in Japan
I doubt that they can be successful in federal service to meet our safety requirements or if they can be, it adds so much weight that they lose much of their advantage FE and much of their fun quotient to drive .
In addition, the gas is directed to 2 or below, the quest for fuel economy is back on the back burner with most buyers, as evidenced by the surge in large SUVs and large sales pick- up stupid behavior on the part of American pilot Yes, but when has that ever stopped them before.
Re Americans should be offered Micro Kei Cars Japan Score 1 Normal.
I once owned a Suzuki SJ410 with the 1000cc 40hp engine a tin can, but very fun to drive.
When I lived in New Zealand, they sold kei cars here in 1986.
CB77 wrote I doubt that they can be federalized successfully to meet our safety requirements or if they can be, it adds so much weight that they lose much of their advantage FE and much of their fun quotient drive .
I'm not afraid there is no real advantage FE talking, and any car class will fit better FE than any real world kei car.
Similarly, there is no real fun to drive quotient speak, they are too small and low power without being particularly light Again, a hot hatch on the Fit class is a much better player.
The only reason Kei-cars sold in Japan is because their special-regime tax and other advantages which ownership of such a large in a country where having a real car is a luxury for many would dismiss the legal regime and it is game over for kei s that we know this does not mean that Japanese manufacturers wouldn t bring a new range of small cars and efficient, but these cars wouldn t have the artificial displacement power size limitations of this which kei-car today.
This is actually the main reason behind the current drive Government abolish the benefits they have realized that the creation of this specific market at home, they prevent Japanese manufacturers to compete globally - these barriers and they will begin making small cars that could end up being successfully sold almost everywhere - keep them and you have something that is only good in Japan.
Re Americans should be offered Micro Kei Cars Japan Score 1 Normal.
It is simple physics, the potential impact energy of an average American sedan without mentioning the SUVs will decimate Keis Kei To be worthy American crash test would require a considerable change in the structure , materials, and therefore the size Even the Fit should have more bumper to adhere to US crash tests.
Everything else already covered by Danielgr, especially the latter, only good in Japan.
The subject shouldn t even be high, I can even write an argument against my amateur-ever-updated blog, but it would be a waste of time, and I have much time to lose like right now, I do anything you really don t see it, but I'm not losing my life away And not will not write an argument against, I think I'll watch vaporize morning dew of the sheet on my garden.
CB77 wrote I doubt that they can be federalized successfully to meet our safety requirements or if they can be, it adds so much weight that they lose much of their advantage FE and much of their fun quotient drive .
I'm not afraid there is no real advantage FE talking, and any car class will fit better FE than any real world kei car.
Similarly, there is no real fun to drive quotient speak, they are too small and low power without being particularly light Again, a hot hatch on the Fit class is a much better player.
The only reason Kei-cars sold in Japan is because their special-regime tax and other advantages which ownership of such a large in a country where having a real car is a luxury for many would dismiss the legal regime and it is game over for kei s that we know this does not mean that Japanese manufacturers wouldn t bring a new range of small cars and efficient, but these cars wouldn t have the artificial displacement power size limitations of this which kei-car today.
This is actually the main reason behind the current drive Government abolish the benefits they have realized that the creation of this specific market at home, they prevent Japanese manufacturers to compete globally - these barriers and they will begin making small cars that could end up being successfully sold almost everywhere - keep them and you have something that is only good in Japan.
I'm afraid your statement doesn t seem correct after checking a site dedicated to jissai nenpi or energy efficiency in real driving conditions While it is true that energy efficiency in real live deflects fuel consumption paper, the same for any other car as well Here are some real examples Live FE.
The appearance fun to drive might not apply to family kei-car, but things are different when looking at a Honda S660 or Daihatsu Copen, which are produced for fun to drive.
Now we look at the point that you missed in your statement why cars are popular in special tax regime side and low cost of ownership They are small kings practice outside, the space offers enormous to inside - the absolute opposite to modern super-unnecessary vehicles that are great on the outside and inside narrow even you will not find a European supermini with the same amount of variance of the space and the good luck interior to try the same thing with a VW Polo and Audi A1 the only thing that really gets close are Japanese makes Honda Fit and Nissan Note But they also doesn t offer sliding doors as does the N-Box.
So to summarize, IMHO the kei car is the best value for money in terms of practicality, energy efficiency and moderate operating costs That being said, I would have nothing against a bigger engine or NA hybrdid carrier for the paper and FE FE closer to the real world.
CB77 wrote I doubt that they can be federalized successfully to meet our safety requirements or if they can be, it adds so much weight that they lose much of their advantage FE and much of their fun quotient drive .
I'm not afraid there is no real advantage FE talking, and any car class will fit better FE than any real world kei car.
Similarly, there is no real fun to drive quotient speak, they are too small and low power without being particularly light Again, a hot hatch on the Fit class is a much better player.
The only reason Kei-cars sold in Japan is because their special-regime tax and other advantages which ownership of such a large in a country where having a real car is a luxury for many would dismiss the legal regime and it is game over for kei s that we know this does not mean that Japanese manufacturers wouldn t bring a new range of small cars and efficient, but these cars wouldn t have the artificial displacement power size limitations of this which kei-car today.
This is actually the main reason behind the current drive Government abolish the benefits they have realized that the creation of this specific market at home, they prevent Japanese manufacturers to compete globally - these barriers and they will begin making small cars that could end up being successfully sold almost everywhere - keep them and you have something that is only good in Japan.
I have another point of view I do not believe this hype Suzuki has a future now because it recycles its successful kei automotive expertise in India Thus Daihatsu in Malaysia and Indonesia Now even Toyota sells rebadged Daihatsu and learn the tiny company.
CB77 wrote I doubt that they can be federalized successfully to meet our safety requirements or if they can be, it adds so much weight that they lose much of their advantage FE and much of their fun quotient drive .
I'm not afraid there is no real advantage FE talking, and any car class will fit better FE than any real world kei car.
Similarly, there is no real fun to drive quotient speak, they are too small and low power without being particularly light Again, a hot hatch on the Fit class is a much better player.
The only reason Kei-cars sold in Japan is because their special-regime tax and other advantages which ownership of such a large in a country where having a real car is a luxury for many would dismiss the legal regime and it is game over for kei s that we know this does not mean that Japanese manufacturers wouldn t bring a new range of small cars and efficient, but these cars wouldn t have the artificial displacement power size limitations of this which kei-car today.
This is actually the main reason behind the current drive Government abolish the benefits they have realized that the creation of this specific market at home, they prevent Japanese manufacturers to compete globally - these barriers and they will begin making small cars that could end up being successfully sold almost everywhere - keep them and you have something that is only good in Japan.
This must be a first in my life, but I completely agree that Daniel said.
CB77 wrote I doubt that they can be federalized successfully to meet our safety requirements or if they can be, it adds so much weight that they lose much of their advantage FE and much of their fun quotient drive .
I'm not afraid there is no real advantage FE talking, and any car class will fit better FE than any real world kei car.
Similarly, there is no real fun to drive quotient speak, they are too small and low power without being particularly light Again, a hot hatch on the Fit class is a much better player.
The only reason Kei-cars sold in Japan is because their special-regime tax and other advantages which ownership of such a large in a country where having a real car is a luxury for many would dismiss the legal regime and it is game over for kei s that we know this does not mean that Japanese manufacturers wouldn t bring a new range of small cars and efficient, but these cars wouldn t have the artificial displacement power size limitations of this which kei-car today.
This is actually the main reason behind the current drive Government abolish the benefits they have realized that the creation of this specific market at home, they prevent Japanese manufacturers to compete globally - these barriers and they will begin making small cars that could end up being successfully sold almost everywhere - keep them and you have something that is only good in Japan.
This must be a first in my life, but I completely agree that Daniel said.
Unfortunately, it seems that polyingticiunts have predictable welched on their promise to change the law Kei.
As roads become congested and the old C-segment approach segments E footprint, it seems to be a growing demand for luxury, innovative small cars.
Midi_Amp wrote No, Kei should be offered in the United States.
It is simple physics, the potential impact energy of an average American sedan without mentioning the SUVs will decimate Keis Kei To be worthy American crash test would require a considerable change in the structure , materials, and therefore the size Even the Fit should have more bumper to adhere to US crash tests.
Everything else already covered by Danielgr, especially the latter, only good in Japan.
The subject shouldn t even be high, I can even write an argument against my amateur-ever-updated blog, but it would be a waste of time, and I have much time to lose like right now, I do anything you really don t see it, but I'm not losing my life away And not will not write an argument against, I think I'll watch vaporize morning dew of the sheet on my garden.
I don t care much for Smart, but the passenger cell remained largely correct in this accident it did much better than most people give credit.
Re Americans should be offered Micro Kei Cars Japan Score 1 Normal.
As mentioned above, the fuel economy is even with or slightly better than the Fit-class vehicles.
The Temple of VTEC Honda and Acura enthusiasts Forums online today Reading Links Re should honda today only good Japan.